Current:Home > NewsTrump’s lawyers tell an appeals court that federal prosecutors are trying to rush his election case -CapitalTrack
Trump’s lawyers tell an appeals court that federal prosecutors are trying to rush his election case
View
Date:2025-04-14 05:54:03
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawyers for Donald Trump told a federal appeals court on Wednesday that it should not speed up its consideration of whether the former president is immune from prosecution, accusing federal prosecutors of trying to rush his 2020 election subversion case through before next year’s presidential election.
“The prosecution has one goal in this case: To unlawfully attempt to try, convict, and sentence President Trump before an election in which he is likely to defeat President Biden,” defense lawyers wrote Wednesday. “This represents a blatant attempt to interfere with the 2024 presidential election and to disenfranchise the tens of millions of voters who support President Trump’s candidacy.”
The issue is of paramount significance to both sides given the potential for a protracted appeal to delay a trial beyond its currently scheduled start date of March 4. Trump faces charges he plotted to overturn the 2020 election after he lost to Democrat Joe Biden, and he has denied doing anything wrong.
Trump’s legal team had appealed a trial judge’s rejection of arguments that he was protected from prosecution for actions he took as president. But special counsel Jack Smith sought to short-circuit that process by asking the Supreme Court on Monday to take up the issue during its current term, a request he acknowledged was “extraordinary” but one he said he was essential to keep the case on track.
Smith’s team simultaneously asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to expedite its consideration of Trump’s appeal, writing: “The public has a strong interest in this case proceeding to trial in a timely manner. The trial cannot proceed, however, before resolution of the defendant’s interlocutory appeal.”
The Supreme Court has indicated that it would decide quickly whether to hear the case, ordering Trump’s lawyers to respond by Dec. 20. The court’s brief order did not signal what it ultimately would do.
A Supreme Court case usually lasts several months, from the time the justices agree to hear it until a final decision. Smith is asking the court to move with unusual, but not unprecedented, speed.
Nearly 50 years ago, the justices acted within two months of being asked to force President Richard Nixon to turn over Oval Office recordings in the Watergate scandal. The tapes were then used later in 1974 in the corruption prosecutions of Nixon’s former aides.
It took the high court just a few days to effectively decide the 2000 presidential election for Republican George W. Bush over Democrat Al Gore.
If the justices decline to step in at this point, Trump’s appeal would continue at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Smith said even a rapid appellate decision might not get to the Supreme Court in time for review and final word before the court’s traditional summer break.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Did Taylor Swift put Travis Kelce 'on the map'? TikTok trend captures hilarious reactions
- Temple University chancellor to take over leadership amid search for new president
- Target to close 9 stores including 3 in San Francisco, citing theft that threatens workers, shoppers
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Why Maryland Is Struggling to Meet Its Own Aggressive Climate Goals
- Public to weigh in on whether wild horses that roam Theodore Roosevelt National Park should stay
- Lionel Messi in limbo ahead of Inter Miami's big US Open Cup final. Latest injury update
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Phoebe Dynevor Reveals What She Learned From Past Romance With Pete Davidson
Ranking
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Jason Ritter Shares How Amazing Wife Melanie Lynskey Helped Him Through Sobriety Journey
- Man jailed while awaiting trial for fatal Apple store crash because monitoring bracelet not charged
- 5 family members, friend dead in crash between train, SUV in Florida: Here's who they were
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Alibaba will spin off its logistics arm Cainiao in an IPO in Hong Kong
- Biden On The Picket Line
- 21 New York Comic-Con Packing Essentials for Every Type of Fan
Recommendation
Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
5 family members, friend dead in crash between train, SUV in Florida: Here's who they were
New book alleges Trump’s ex-chief of staff’s suits smelled ‘like a bonfire’ from burning papers
Supreme Court denies Alabama's bid to use GOP-drawn congressional map in redistricting case
Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
How Ariana Grande's Inner Circle Feels About Ethan Slater Romance
Less-redacted report on Maryland church abuse still redacts names of church leaders
Law aiming to ban drag performances in Texas is unconstitutional, federal judge rules