Current:Home > NewsWorld’s Leading Polluters Have Racked Up a $10 Trillion Carbon Debt -CapitalTrack
World’s Leading Polluters Have Racked Up a $10 Trillion Carbon Debt
View
Date:2025-04-16 04:22:21
The countries most responsible for global warming owe the rest of the world a tremendous debt, with the author of a new study published Monday in the journal Nature Climate Change putting the figure at $10 trillion.
The author came up with that number by calculating how much CO2 each country emitted per capita since 1960, generally recognized as the onset of the worst of human-caused global warming. Countries with high per capita emissions carry a carbon debt while countries with lower per capita emissions have a carbon credit.
“We in the rich world have over-contributed to the problem and consequently there is a debt associated with that that needs to be honored in some way,” said lead author Damon Matthews a researcher at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada.
That was the purpose of the Green Climate Fund, established in 2010 by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to help vulnerable countries address the challenges of climate change. Its initial goal was to distribute $100 billion each year in public and private funding until 2020. So far wealthy nations have pledged $10.2 billion, a fraction of the debt, according to the new study.
The United States is responsible for about 40 percent of the debt.
The study concludes the carbon debt of high-emitting countries totals 250 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide since 1990. The U.S. government calculates the social cost of CO2 emissions –including property damage from increased flooding, reduced agricultural productivity and adverse effects on human health– is about $40 per metric ton of CO2.
Multiplying the two figures produces the $10 trillion figure.
Others, however, say Matthews’ accounting may be overly simplistic. According to Jan Fuglestvedt research director of the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo, Norway, the dates chosen to calculate the debt are arbitrary. Emissions since 1960 account for about 66 percent of CO2 emissions since the start of the industrial era in 1750; emissions since 1990 are 36 percent.
Counting earlier emissions could change the debts owed by different countries, although Fuglestvedt admitted deciding when to start counting is more of a policy choice than a scientific one.
“When should we know and when should we start counting the emissions that change climate?” Fuglestvedt asked. “That goes beyond natural sciences.”
Another issue with the study is counting emissions only by country, said Liane Schalatek, who has attended Green Climate Fund board meetings on behalf of the Heinrich Böll Foundation North America, where she is associate director.
“The biggest polluters in absolute terms are not necessarily countries but entities within countries, that is very often large corporations,” Schalatek said. “If you put their pollution together [they] actually make up the majority of the pollution.”
A 2013 study funded in part by the Böll Foundation found nearly two-thirds of carbon dioxide emitted since the 1750s can be traced to the 90 largest fossil fuel and cement producers, most of which are still operating.
Although the Green Climate Fund does not address corporate responsibility, Schalatek said it is time to stop haggling about where this money will come from and time to start giving larger sums.
“They should really just say 100 billion is the minimum and we should be thinking about how we can scale that up post 2020,” Schalatek said.
Karen Orenstein, an international policy analyst for Friends of the Earth, said, however, that studies like this don’t address the real reason the carbon debt exists.
“A lot of this isn’t really about what science says or academics say,” Orenstein said. “It’s political.”
veryGood! (78935)
Related
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Jay Inslee on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
- 236 Mayors Urge EPA Not to Repeal U.S. Clean Power Plan
- Khloe Kardashian Shares Sweet New Family Photo Featuring Her Baby Boy
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- What Would a City-Level Green New Deal Look Like? Seattle’s About to Find Out
- Here Are All of the Shows That Have Been Impacted By the WGA Strike 2023
- Is it safe to work and commute outside? What experts advise as wildfire smoke stifles East Coast.
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Beyoncé's Makeup Artist Sir John Shares His Best-Kept Beauty Secrets
Ranking
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Families fear a ban on gender affirming care in the wake of harassment of clinics
- Game, Set, Perfect Match: Inside Enrique Iglesias and Anna Kournikova's Super-Private Romance
- Property Rights Outcry Stops Billion-Dollar Pipeline Project in Georgia
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Selling Sunset's Jason Oppenheim Teases Intense New Season, Plus the Items He Can't Live Without
- Kirsten Gillibrand on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
- Ray Liotta's Cause of Death Revealed
Recommendation
California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
Selling Sunset's Jason Oppenheim Teases Intense New Season, Plus the Items He Can't Live Without
False information is everywhere. 'Pre-bunking' tries to head it off early
Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniels in trademark fight over poop-themed dog toy
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Vaccines used to be apolitical. Now they're a campaign issue
A doctor's Ebola memoir is all too timely with a new outbreak in Uganda
Artificial intelligence could soon diagnose illness based on the sound of your voice