Current:Home > MarketsAdvocates say Supreme Court must preserve new, mostly Black US House district for 2024 elections -CapitalTrack
Advocates say Supreme Court must preserve new, mostly Black US House district for 2024 elections
View
Date:2025-04-15 10:27:06
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Voting rights advocates said Wednesday they will go to the Supreme Court in hopes of preserving a new majority Black congressional district in Louisiana for the fall elections, the latest step in a complicated legal fight that could determine the fate of political careers and the balance of power in the next Congress.
A divided panel of federal judges on Tuesday rejected a map approved in January by an unusual alliance of Republicans, who dominate the Legislature, and Democrats who want a second mostly Black — and mostly Democratic — congressional district.
Republican state Attorney General Liz Murrill said she would appeal Tuesday’s ruling. And a coalition of individuals and civil rights groups filed a formal notice Wednesday saying they would go to the Supreme Court.
Jared Evans, an attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, said that by the end of the week advocates will ask the Supreme Court to keep the new maps in place for 2024, pending further legal action. He cited the need to have district maps in place soon. State election officials have said they need to know what maps to use by May 15 for the fall elections.
The same judicial panel that rejected the new map — often referred to by its legislative bill number, SB8 — set a Monday status conference to discuss what the state must do next. Evans said there are numerous options, including the appointment of a special master to draw a map or giving the Legislature another chance. But Evans said time is growing short.
“At this point with the election six months away, the Supreme Court’s going to have to step in and say SB8 can move forward or it can’t,” Evans said.
Republican Gov. Jeff Landry, meanwhile, expressed frustration with the process.
“The constant inconsistency of the Federal Courts is remarkable and disappointing,” Landry said Wednesday in Baton Rouge. “The people of Louisiana deserve better from our Federal Courts. Either the Legislature is in control of drawing a map or Federal Courts are, but they both can’t be!”
Landry, a former attorney general, had defended a 2022 map with only one mostly Black district among six. But, ruling in a Baton Rouge-filed lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Shelly Dick blocked use of the 2022 map. She said it likely violated the federal Voting Rights Act with boundary lines that divided Black voters among five mostly white districts. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later gave lawmakers a deadline for coming up with a new map.
Landry, who became governor in January, urged the Legislature to draw a new map rather than leave it to the federal courts. With Landry’s backing, SB8 was approved.
But a group of 12 self-identified non-African American voters filed a lawsuit in western Louisiana against the new district, which slashes across the state to link Black populations in four disparate metropolitan areas from the northwest to the southeast. They said it was drawn with race as the predominant motivation.
Two members of a three-judge panel appointed to hear that constitutional challenge sided with the plaintiffs, setting up the pending Supreme Court challenge. A third judge dissented, saying evidence showed political considerations — including protection of the districts of House Speaker Mike Johnson and House Republican Leader Steve Scalise — had been a major motivation.
The new map sacrificed the district of Republican incumbent Garret Graves, who supported a GOP opponent of Landry in last year’s governor’s race. State Sen. Cleo Fields, a Black Democratic former congressman, has said he will run for the seat.
___
Associated Press reporter Sara Cline in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, contributed to this story.
veryGood! (3515)
Related
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Celebrating July 2, America's other Independence Day
- Judge Clears Exxon in Investor Fraud Case Over Climate Risk Disclosure
- Jana Kramer Is Pregnant with Baby No. 3, Her First With Fiancé Allan Russell
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Matty Healy Sends Message to Supporters After Taylor Swift Breakup
- Wednesday's Percy Hynes White Denies Baseless, Harmful Misconduct Accusations
- Vanderpump Rules Reunion: Tom Sandoval and Raquel Leviss' Affair Comes to a Shocking Conclusion
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Joey Chestnut remains hot dog eating champ. Here's how many calories he consumed during the event.
Ranking
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Explosive devices detonated, Molotov cocktail thrown at Washington, D.C., businesses
- Stranded motorist shot dead by trooper he shot after trooper stopped to help him, authorities say
- Controversial BLM Chief Pendley’s Tenure Extended Again Without Nomination, Despite Protests
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Vanessa and Nick Lachey Taking Much Needed Family Time With Their 3 Kids
- ‘This Is Not Normal.’ New Air Monitoring Reveals Hazards in This Maine City.
- Environmental Justice Grabs a Megaphone in the Climate Movement
Recommendation
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
IPCC: Radical Energy Transformation Needed to Avoid 1.5 Degrees Global Warming
How Much Damage are Trump’s Solar Tariffs Doing to the U.S. Industry?
China’s Dramatic Solar Shift Could Take Sting Out of Trump’s Panel Tariffs
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
China’s Dramatic Solar Shift Could Take Sting Out of Trump’s Panel Tariffs
Texas Charges Oil Port Protesters Under New Fossil Fuel Protection Law
Exxon and Oil Sands Go on Trial in New York Climate Fraud Case